TL;DR:could we please get a new developing-connectome tag to support user feedback for the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP)
With the new upcoming release of the developing connectome dataset, we were thinking of hosting Q&A user support on NeuroStars.
Don’t worry we’d handle most of the replies of course, although it would be great to see an active community arising with the dataset
Do you think it would be fine to create an initial developing-connectome tag? I’m not a big fan of the dhcp acronym since it’s hard to look up later on for obvious networking precedence… but open to other suggestions.
I guess a single tag encompassing all the aspects of the project (access to the dataset, processing pipelines, general feedback, …) would be sufficient initially as we do not expect a massive amount of traffic. Also it can surely be combined with existing tags on neurostars and enrich the set of solutions.
If that works for you, we could start advertising neurostars as the de facto solution to get support with our dataset, since we already have to deal with a few emails here and there with regards to our initial beta data release.
Why not just to keep it the short “dHCP” – due to domain specifics of the website unlikely we would ever need a DHCP tag (as for “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol”)?
done. unfortunately only people with certain levels can create tags. or we can create a community spreadsheet that we could update from time to time. in general i’m happy to create tags as necessary, so pinging on this thread is fine.
happy to also consider more members as responsible tag creators.
Hey satra, what do you think about including the the scikit-learn tag? I would like to address my question to all members who are interested in machine-learning. I know that the nilearn tag already exists but I think scikit-learn should also be included since both are strongly connected to each other.