More precisely, we have tested 2 methods (for each subject, normalized in a same space):
Searchlight : for each voxel, we run an MVPA analysis in a sphere that is centered on the voxel. We thus obtain an accuracy map for each voxel tested. We can then test the value of this accuracy across all the subjects of our population.
MVPA analysis on the whole brain. For instance, in nilearn :
support vector classifier - svc, with penalty = tv-l1,
or SpaceNetClassifier with penalty=graph-net).
Here we obtain a weight map for each subject. We can then test the value of these weights accross all the subjects of our population.
Which is the most rigorous method ? What biases do they each bring ? What differences in interpretations do we get from one approach or the other?
Hi, I agree, it’s a difficult question with no perfect answer…
Group-level searchlight can be a solution at the population level (cf our recent paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116205) with yet some other drawbacks (we need to perform registration of the data to the MNI or another template, with all the unperfections of the registration) but some potential advantages in detection power…