I need to estimate a warp field (we are using ANTS). Call this warp1
Later I need to L-R flip my image and apply further warping on the flipped image. Unfortunately, this means I need to estimate the warp field all over again for the flipped image. Call this warp2.
I’m wondering if it would make sense to L-R flip the warp1 field and use that for transformations instead of estimating warp2 for the flipped image. I’m thinking this shortcut would save a lot of time, but I’m concerned it might be wrong-headed.
To my understanding, flipping the warp field warp1 would only work if the target image when you calculated this warp field was symetric. If not, you would need to calculate warp2 that will be different from the L-R flipped version of warp1.