Summary of the experiment:
We have 3 conditions and 2 measurements per condition (pre and post), in a crossover design with 21 subjects. I was able to perform individual-run analyses and pre vs. post contrasts for each condition. However, I am encountering difficulties setting up a group-level analysis with these repeated measures (there are 6 total observations per subject).
Has anyone faced this issue and managed to plan an acceptable configuration using the FEAT GUI/FSL that could help me?
Hi! This can be tricky. Do you have a rough matrix or a description of what your outcome contrast would ideally look like? Then I might be able to point you the right direction.
Thanks! I’m still new to FLAME and higher-level modeling in FSL, so I don’t yet have a clear idea of what the design matrix should look like for this case.
but my current approach…
At the group level, I am using:
FEAT → Higher-level analysis
Paired t-test (Two-Paired Group Difference)
Inputs:
COPEs from the Pre condition
COPEs from the Post condition
Model: fixed effects (since I’m focusing on within-sample inference)
My main contrast of interest is:
Post > Pre (and the reverse)
My questions
Is this paired higher-level FEAT setup the recommended way to compare Pre vs Post for a visual task in FSL?
Would there be any advantage to using a different approach (e.g., mixed-effects with FLAME, or modeling the difference already at first level)?
For visual tasks specifically, are there best practices regarding:
ROI-based vs whole-brain analysis?
Handling multiple runs or visits?
Any feedback, suggestions, or references would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!